I really like this: > Yes, of course we sense Dynamic Quality, though as you insinuate, it's more > non-sensing than actual sensing. That's what gets us off the hot stove... "a > vague sense of we know not what." But we cannot describe what it is, for as > soon as we do, it is no longer Dynamic Quality. > > Dan > Maybe you could also say that since Quality is one of the resouces with which we picture the world, it cannot itself be pictured. David MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
- Re: MD Re:MEMES RISKYBIZ9
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Dan Glover
- Copies vs. Originals (Re: MD Re:MEMES) Jonathan B. Marder
- MD "undifferentiated aesthetic contin... David
- Re: Copies vs. Originals (Re: MD Re:MEMES) Dan Glover
- Re: Copies vs. Originals (Re: MD Re:ME... Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: Copies vs. Originals (Re: MD Re:MEMES) Kenneth Van Oost
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Kenneth Van Oost
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Ascmjk
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Dan Glover
- Re: MD Re:MEMES ego
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Richard Edgar
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Dan Glover
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Richard Edgar
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Dan Glover
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Richard Edgar
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Danila Oder
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Johannes Volmert
- RE: MD Re:MEMES Chris Lofting
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Dan Glover
- Re: MD Re:MEMES Kenneth Van Oost
