re Jonathan B. Marder's contibution to the Re: Copies vs. Originals (Re: MD
Re:MEMES) discussion:
> Whether or not you can step into the same river twice depends on how you
> define the river.
But I don't think we step into definitions, do we? That is exactly
Heraclitus's point: qua undefined, nothing can be the same as itself because
there is no 'itself' - you can't even step into the same river once. Raw,
the whole world is like this, not just rivers: all is flux.
"undifferentiated aesthetic continuum"
- as Northrop and Prisig would have it.
The river is a metaphor, after all.
D.
http://website.lineone.net/~david.robjant/index.html
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
