> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MD
> JON
> >So I think it's fair to say Pirsig considers morality to be as real as
> >gravity. I wonder how many members agree that Morality and
> Quality are the
> >same thing? Platt, you agree. Horse agrees. Jonathan agrees (i
> think!). 3WD
> >I'm not sure about. Diana I believe thinks they are different,
> and does Ian,
> >Dennis, and probably Glenn. If I'm mistaken, please let me know.
> We should do
> >a survey on this issue. We really should.
I'm skimming and not really following this thread, but just for the record I'm very
much of the opinion that quality and morality are the same. I despair when I see
people questioning the wisdom of Pirsig's Q=M because I really think it's the heart of
the MOQ. Whilst I have quibbles about the four levels and even the dynamic-static
split, the idea that reality=morality=quality remains rock solid and fascinating to
me.
I think I've written about it several times though ... can't help wondering why I've
been misunderstood.
Diana
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
