> > > [Kevin previously]
> > > You took that literally?
> >
> > [SA previously]
> > What literally?
[Kevin]
> You indicated you were going eat the deer. We are
> [one with] what we eat?
I guess it depends on what you mean by literal.
When I say I'm one with nature, without eating nature,
this is also literal. How to explain any of this
would depend upon analogies based upon literal
experiences, but these literal experiences would have
greater depth in meaning based upon these literal
experiences being metaphors for dynamic quality.
Dynamic quality can't be literal, if literal means
absolutely defining any experience. Sure, eating the
deer is a static pattern. I guess I'm just pointing
out the baggage that may come with defining literal.
thanks.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
