Quoting Kevin Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You appear to be subordinating the "seeing process" to the MOQ. This kills > it, > imo. > Better to say the MOQ points to the "seeing process," again, imo. > > > The more I think about it, the more I become convinced that the MOQ > > provides a bridge over paradoxes, recursions, self-contradictions and > > loops because it rises above and looks down at intellectual level. But, I > > could be wrong. > > I can understand how one would see it this way if one sees the MOQ as > something > that embodies the "seeing process." Backwards, imo.
Hi Kevin, You may be right, but I can't separate the MOQ from it's heart and soul, namely direct experience/valuation, i.e., Penrose's "seeing" metaphor. Otherwise, the MOQ is just another SOM metaphysics, pointing from itself (subjective) to otherness (objective). Platt ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
