Quoting Heather Perella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [Platt] > > The more I think about it, the more I become > > convinced that the MOQ > > provides a bridge over paradoxes, recursions, > > self-contradictions and > > loops because it rises above and looks down at > > intellectual level. But, I > > could be wrong. > > > You say, "The more I think..." "MOQ... bridge" > "looks down at intellectual level." So, your thought > is able to look down upon intellect? Or, what else is > looking down, it seems your saying valuation is > looking down, but what of this thought your having > about valuation looking down? Or, how are you able to > think this as you say above, "The more I think..."
Yes, good of you to point it out. When I say "I think " I am using the verbiage of SOM which, as has been noted by Hofstader and others, inevitably leads to recursive loops --- as your questions so vividly illustrate! It is my habit, and perhaps that of others, to say "I think" when actually I was reporting a Dynamic understanding as in the MOQ, not a logical conclusion as in SOM. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
