[Platt]
> So if MOQ Quality escapes intellect by being outside
> symbolism and definition,
> how then can we be aware of it other than by
> silencing our chattering minds by
> meditating? I think Arlo has the answer -- by the
> "pointers" of art, myth and
> metaphor. Further, one can pay attention to her
> instincts, intuitions and
> "out-of-the-blue" insights in the certain knowledge
> that understanding can
> be felt on the pulses as well as conceived.
It is a perceptional shift. A shift in how
intellect understands reality. Intellect is not
congested with trying to perceive reality with
subjects over here and objects over here divided up
here, and there, everywhere, where, where, old
McDonald... sorry laughter got a hold of me, but
seriously, I see you Platt as intellectualizing
quality without S/O above. I see you pointing, as
Arlo mentioned beyond the paradox. S/O does point at
quality, but once quality is perceived paradox doesn't
have to be revisited over and over again. A new
habitual way of intellectualizing of a static quality
level called intellectual level changes this S/O of
the SOM style perception into a MOQ living philosophy
where the intellectual changes in how it conducts
itself based upon a quality reality, not a SOM viewed
reality. I don't see quality as being outside of
intellect, thus, symbolism and definition. It is an
intellect intellectualizing quality, not just stuck on
intellectualizing S/O. Intellect intellectualizing
quality are these pointers and 'out of the blue'
insights. Intellect only viewing S/O will only view
subjects dividing objects, etc... etc... These are
two types of intellect. The MOQ joins these two types
of intellect by shifting the S and O from dividing and
that being the last, or end perception - a divided
world. The MOQ shifts this dividing
perception/intellect of SOM and does not get stuck in
the strange looping of divide, upon divide, upon
divide... back upon itself, never getting beyond its'
divide. The MoQ is able to shift these paradox that
points out S/O is not the end, the ultimate reality.
The MoQ points out how quality=reality, and S/O is a
koan shattering, and shocking the mind into a
different reality when the reality perceived is a
quality reality, and thus, S/O is not the ultimate
perception, for when this koan was shatters the mind a
new perceived world is glimmered (dharmakaya light),
and another perception/intellect is able to take
hole/static latch and patterns of intellect evolve
that are static intellectual quality, not SOM.
snow melt,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com. Try it now.
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
