[Quoting Ron]:
> Does "one-ness" mean the absence of opposites, > for if there were no opposites > there would be no change > no value > no-thing > does "one-ness" mean no-thing-ness? > > is it that the subject is an illusion? YES!! You have just stated Cusa's theory of non-contrariety. Congratulations, Ham moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
