Ron, How can you show objective reality is primary, objectively - without humans?
Micah -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ron Kulp Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 8:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?) [Micah] Ron, I see where you, Case, and Platt misinterpret me. "Objective reality" doesn't mean reality is primary. Objective has a different meaning than primary. Not only do they have different meanings, they're spelled different. Now there is no "objective" way to show reality is primary, we would need to be present to prove it is primary, which is a contradiction. Reality is objective - not in my head, it however is not primary...I could go on or you could read Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert Pirsig. I am just restating what he said at his breakdown or breakthrough on "quality". You know Plato, Aristotle and the horns of a dilemma. A forum on Pirsig filled with people that don't understand Pirsig. Cool! Micah [x] Micah, Plain and simple, objective reality must be primary or we could not discuss Pirsig. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
