At 03:00 PM 3/19/2007, you wrote: >[Marsha] >What???????? 'Betterness' is not subjective because Quality is not >subjective? In a monist metaphysics, how is the comparison being >executed? I'm curious. > >[Arlo] >So am I. Do you think Quality is subjective? How can Quality precede >subject and objects but "value" be subjective? Does Quality not exist >on the inorganic level, in your opinion? >
Arlo, You're answering a question with a question? It's just that your explanation doesn't make any sense to me. In my little world, Quality/DQ is not moral in any way, not 'betterness, and not comparative. On the other hand, the SQ/SPoVs represented in the four levels is/are morality itself. This morality is created through constant comparison and repetition. Before the dynamic/static split, or when discussing DQ, the MOQ is a monistic. There is no comparison possible. Soooooooooooo, in a monist metaphysics, how is the comparison being implied by the word 'betterness' be executed? m moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
