Quoting Arlo Bensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [Arlo] > And you assume this to be the case? You don't think maybe the Brits > got caught in an act of espionage? Would they (or us) admit it if > they had? I'm not sure what's going on here, but I am not so quick to > just assume "our side" or "their side" of the story, to the point of > risking war. But I ask myself, what benefit would it be to Iran to go > into open waters and kidnap British soldiers? This would be like > asking for the US and British to invade their country. On the other > hand, what benefit would it be to Britain (and the US) to conduct > espionage on Iran? Which is the more likely scenario? Us spying on > them and getting caught? Or them attempting to get us to invade them? How about they made a mistake and are afraid to lose face by admitting it? > [Platt] > So food, shelter and clothing ought to taxpayer provided, too? > > [Arlo] > I have no problem with my tax dollars providing basic food staples. > Nor do I have a problem with tax-supported shelters or even > tax-subsidized loans for the poor to get basic housing. Now I assume > you'll try to make this into lobster tails and mansions for everyone, > but that's not the case. Why work? ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
