Arlo, et al

"Have I ever been in a pub and heard a song ?"
Doh. Does the pope shit in the woods ?
How did you know my middle name Arlo ?

I'm practically an addict of late night live music joints; trouble is
I always fall for it, buy the artist's often amateur produced CD, take
it home and 9 times out of 10 ask myself why did I do that - sure it
sounded better through the smoke and alcohol ?

Of course the answer is easy - dynamic quality - one time in 10 (maybe
a hundred) you've found a gem thay repays the disappointments. (Tommy
Womack out of Nashville is my current rave. Aside - talking of
Nashville experiences - had the surreal experience of witnessing G3
triple-bill of rock guitarists the other night - performing in that
wonderful old converted gospel church that was once the original Ole
Opry and by day is the Opry museum - talk about cultural mix. Similar
experience at the old Atlanta Tabernacle too -- hmmm, a theme here,
but I digress.)

Agree with all the others' points about museums / galleries / concert
halls / zoos - for certain kinds of artistic experience, they can only
ever be a compromise. I see their main static roles as the value of
historical preservation - part of education - beyond that, art as
experience really needs to stay close to the culture it's talking to
and encourage participation, where the real quality lies. Mix and
variety are key qualities - the essence of dynamic I guess.

Ian

On 4/10/07, Khaled Alkotob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Arlo, Ian, Ben
>
> Which brings us to an argument I had with a local museum director. Of
> course the local art scene is trying for more customers, and the
> customers find their fix somewhere else.
>
> Why do I need to go to a museum to appreciate these things when they can
> be found somewhere else. If I go down to Tower Records, and spent an hour
> flipping through music albums ( before the advent of CDs) and simply
> enjoy the art work, is that a lesser quality experience than if it was
> hanging inside their walls. Is there not talent involved in the creation
> of these album covers?
> Museums. in a way have become like zoos. They take things from their
> element and put them in an enclosure and expect the visitor to enjoy the
> full experience. Watching a couple of zebras chew their cud is different
> tan being there and seeing a few thousands on the march.
>
> As Arlo said, listening to that song at that moment in a pub, makes an
> impression that can't be duplicated.
>
> I remember a saxophone reverberating in the financial district in San
> Francisco at 7:00 in the morning, that is still with me to this day.
>
> Maybe the proper place for Mr. Bell to play IS the train station. Just
> because it's unexpected and he is reaching people he would not normally
> reach.
>
> Khaled
>
>
> > [Ian]
> > it's the cultural context of the "performance", whatever peoples
> > actual "tastes" for a given musical genre.
> >
> > [Arlo]
> > A painting hanging in a museum is not a simple "art object"
> > suspended  in isolation awaiting an unsuspecting subject. The museum
> itself
> > provides a whole host of contextual cues, from Khaled's pointing out
> of "validation" (if its hanging in a museum, it MUST be good), to
> > the anticipation and expectation of the experience carried through
> > echoey
> > wooden floors, and quiet hushed talk to spotlighting and museum
> > guards.
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to