Quoting ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Second, when Platt assumed the example as about "social" medicine, it was enough for him to denounce a system. When it was shown the example was about "private"
medicine, did you hear the same denouncement? No, of course not.

Platt commented April 15th:

Arlo has been criticizing me all along for not reading the article [properly] and now comes
up with the statement that it was about "private" medicine.

Ant McWatt comments:

That's the hilarious part of this thread. Due to Platt's ignorance that much of the NHS has been privatised over the last 25 years by politicians following right-wing Thatcherite policies (as Case pointed out, this is a fact that would be known by any reasonably intelligent UK based reader of the Independent), he ended-up criticising "Grimecare" who are a privatised health organization even though a cursory Google check would have revealed this information to him. No thesis building required.

Platt continued to dig his "rhetorical hole" even deeper, April 15th:

I doubt if even a
died-in-the-wool socialist like Ant McWatt would claim the story was about
"private" medicine when the women was misdiagnosed twice in an NHS hospital.
But, I could be wrong.

Ant McWatt comments:

Yes, wrong again Platt.  On three counts:

Firstly, rather than a socialist, I'm a died-in-the-wool "MOQ-ite" (i.e. someone open to usefulness of a particular idea irrespective of its ideological heritage) unless, of course, you think an activity such as selling cars in a free market is a type of socialism.

Secondly, the women [Ms Christian] was misdiagnosed only _once_ in an NHS hospital. See the Guardian article that Arlo highlighted for this detail at:

www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2056106,00.html

The private or public nature of this diagnosis is not revealed (by the Guardian or the Independent) so it could have been done by medical staff provided by a (relative expensive) private nursing agency despite being carried out _in_ an NHS hospital.

Thirdly, when the GP out-of-hours service was publically funded (as it was pre-Thatcher) it would have been a _doctor_ who would have spoken or visited a patient. This damns the idea that private healthcare is better than publically funded healthcare as the Independent article shows:

"Two days later, [Ms Christian's] condition had deteriorated and she called the local GP out-of-hours service complaining that she had been vomiting a 'black tar-like substance' and that she had severe pain, dehydration and constipation. The nurse [at "Grimecare"] who took the call said her case was not serious enough to call out the emergency doctor, and advised her to take laxatives for the constipation."

"The coroner said the nurse had 'totally failed' to deal with the case. 'Had Ms Christian been seen by a doctor at this stage ... it is surely inevitable that she would have been admitted,' he said. Even at this stage it was likely her life would have been saved, he added."

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/article2444479.ece

So we see that it was the privatised nature of the out-of-hours service that ultimately resulted in this poor woman's death i.e. cutting costs by using a nurse to provide critical medical advice rather than a doctor. Even at this stage [that Ms Christian contacted "Grimecare"] it was likely her life would have been saved...

With Platt generously showing us the limitations of privatised medicine, I now look forward to him demanding that a publically provided health system be set-up in South Carolina to prevent such tragic and avoidable incidents happening there.



.

_________________________________________________________________
MSN is giving away a trip to Vegas to see Elton John.  Enter to win today. http://msnconcertcontest.com?icid-nceltontagline

moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to