Applying ususal MOQ zealotry to the rounding problem I think you* > produce another kind of maths thats no bloody use to anyone
By "you*" I mean "one" by which I mean "me". Please dont appologise I'm all for zealotry - in for a penny in for a pound. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ron Kulp > Sent: 20 April 2007 15:00 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MD] Heads or tails? > > > [Jos] > Applying ususal MOQ zealotry to the rounding problem I think you > produce another kind of maths thats no bloody use to anyone. > To be accurate you have to show some factor that allows the > two sides to > be equated precisely by assigning relative values to the > different units > as well as an element that specifies quantity. > > [Ron] > Topos does this. I was just pointing out the flaw in conventional math > and in conventional > thinking by my examples. Please excuse the zealotry but it was very > difficult to explain > and no one really thinks it's a big deal. But in pointing out the > problem, a workable > theory of quantum physics which relates to the MOQ was found. > I feel it > also relates to > how we percieve also. Why we see perfect form and value particular > patterns more than others. > And why MOQ may change this. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Kulp > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 8:56 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MD] Heads or tails? > > > > > [Jos] > > Do you consider interger units to be representative values or > quantities? > Like you imply, with quantities you have to assume that your comparing > apples with apples, but with values the units could relate to > anything. > Applying ususal MOQ zealotry to the rounding problem I think > you produce > another kind of maths thats no bloody use to anyone. > To be accurate you have to show some factor that allows the > two sides to > be equated precisely by assigning relative values to the > different units > as well as an element that specifies quantity. > > So instead of saying 1+1=2 you have to say > > a1+b1=c(a1+b1) > where: > a = unrealised absolute value of apples, b = unrealised > absoute value of > bananas c = absolute comparative value between apples and bananas. > > The observer assigns their own assumed values to the absolutes and > everyone gets a different answer. > In fact the more I think about it all I'm doing is > translating language > into a less comprehensible numerical system of expression. > Its like you > cant "solve" the equation at all, because to to be accurate every term > you introduce has another unknowable (oxymoronic) dynamic "constant" > applied to it and to its absolute relationship to the other terms. > > If you compare static patterns of different levels I think it > gets even > worse as, as the terms are all derivatives of each other. > > [Ron] > That is why this Topos theory is so exciting, it is taking this into > account by using a topology of micro sets as a dynamic value.. A > measurement system which changes as the phenomena it is measuring > Changes. It still is'nt "cathing the rainbow" but it puts it damn near > right in your lap. > It in effect is the closest method of obtaining a static pattern of > dynamic quality yet. > Comparable to to Pirsigs term "Quality". It's exciting > because it is one > more argument for the accuracy of MOQ. > > > > > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the > Government Secure Intranet Anti-Virus service supplied by > Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM > Certificate Number 2006/04/0007.) In case of problems, please > call your organisations IT Helpdesk. > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, > monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. > > > This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the > attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, > disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are > not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and > inform the sender by return e-mail. > > This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the > attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, > disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are > not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and > inform the sender by return e-mail. > > This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may > be monitored, recorded and retained by the Department For > Constitutional Affairs. E-mail monitoring / blocking software > may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You > have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when > composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. > This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Department For Constitutional Affairs. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet Anti-Virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
