A "meta-point" Arlo, Being driven by disagreement ...
That is our problem in a nutshell. A presumption that the best way to advance knowledge is a dialectic that involves either or logic and some mis-guided idea that the objective of everything is "disproof" - misplaced "scientific method". I repeat an earlier plea. "Me too" posts are NOT a waste of in-box space. Far from it. Constructive (inclusional / integrative) synthesis is at least as valuable as detructive analysis. You say A, I say I agree with A. Is not the same as A tautology (or simply A itself) That's no progress. It's more like AxA + IanxA + ArloxA + (IanxArlo) Added value lies beyond pre-school math (aka arithmetic). Rant over Ian On 4/29/07, ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Ian] > Hi Arlo, I've been re-capping missed threads this weekend. Did no-one respond > to this one ? > > [Arlo] > No. But I notice that it is disagreement that drives 98% of the posts, so I > took silence to be more-or-less head nodding. > > [Ian] > Hippies were highly moral, they simply made some mistakes. No-one should be > damned for that. Failure to learn from repeated mistakes is the greater sin. > > [Arlo] > The hippies were the moral crowd. The one mistake they made was confusing > biological for Dynamic Quality (excess in regards to sex and drugs). I think > going back to see what made them the moral guys in the first place is a good > place to start thinking about where we should be going. > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
