A "meta-point" Arlo,
Being driven by disagreement ... That is our problem in a nutshell. A presumption that the best way to advance knowledge is a dialectic that involves either or logic and some mis-guided idea that the objective of everything is "disproof" - misplaced "scientific method". I repeat an earlier plea. "Me too" posts are NOT a waste of in-box space. Far from it. Constructive (inclusional / integrative) synthesis is at least as valuable as detructive analysis. You say A, I say I agree with A. Is not the same as A tautology (or simply A itself) That's no progress. It's more like AxA + IanxA + ArloxA + (IanxArlo) Added value lies beyond pre-school math (aka arithmetic). Rant over Ian I agree it is questionable to assume a non-answer as meaning agreemet or just indifference. Depending on the statement and the value of the statement to the one who made it. Feedback However lo-key is allways appreciated and has more value than no-statement. I have made Several relevent statements involving Ham and quite a few directed right at him but more often than not I get no response which leaves me to interpret it as indifference largely. Which may not be the case. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
