DM: But you just gotta have some latching to evolve. Ian says: This is my point to Krimel in the other thread ... The dynamic happenings may be "random", but the net result is to "improve" upon the static latches, (unless you actively destroy the latches).
[Krimel] Sort of but at a bifurcation point the future state can not be predicted. It might be better. It might be worse. You can say that a fall back to the stone age is "better" than extinction. But that is the kind of hyper-optimism that says I am lucky when I survive rolling my car. Seems to me, that rolling your car is pretty crappy luck. I guess "luck" has a lot to do with context. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
