[Kevin]
> The consensus appears to be that, according to the
> MoQ, feelings and
> emotions belong to the biological level. From this
> perspective it makes
> sense to regard sentiment as so much useless fluff,
> inconveniences and
> distractions. The best response is to avoid them.
> They have nothing to
> teach or inform. And because they're source is
> biological there is
> nothing a person can do about them save experience
> the feeling.
> Is this about right...according to the MoQ?
I don't regard feeling/emotions as having to be
biological. I admit my limits of recognition on these
classifying of particulars into this static level or
that static level.
Sure the sense of touch is biological, but
emotions I don't regard these as such. I conversed
with Platt that intellect and culture are static
patterns of quality. My point is that intellect and
culture are static quality, so is biological and
inorganic. I also mentioned how quality is not only
static but dynamic. Thus, in regard to emotions, they
are static patterns. Now as to what static level
emotions belong, well, as thoughts, emotions mention
something telling about a certain experience, but I've
not been adept on classifying particulars into any
single level, whether that static level be biological
or intellect, etc...
blue still noticed as the sun's light dims,
SA
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
