[Platt]
Anyway, it doesn't make sense to say we are common knowledge. 

[Arlo]
No, it doesn't. Which is why if you read what I wrote, and not excised an
isolated statement, you'd see that this is not what I mean.

The "self" is an emergent referential point between our UNIQUE
bodily-kinesthetic experience AND our assimilation of the COLLECTIVE
consciousness. All you are doing is attempting to reify your little epic war.
But make no mistake, our "sevles" are the dialogically constructed embodiment
of the collective consciousness, which is not some external "shared" object or
pattern.

But I have no real interest in devolving, again, into the individual v.
collective nonsense again. If that's the only place this is going to go with
you, I'm gonna bow out now. 


moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to