Quoting ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [Platt] > Anyway, it doesn't make sense to say we are common knowledge. > > [Arlo] > No, it doesn't. Which is why if you read what I wrote, and not excised an > isolated statement, you'd see that this is not what I mean. > > The "self" is an emergent referential point between our UNIQUE > bodily-kinesthetic experience AND our assimilation of the COLLECTIVE > consciousness. All you are doing is attempting to reify your little epic war. > But make no mistake, our "sevles" are the dialogically constructed embodiment > of the collective consciousness, which is not some external "shared" object or > pattern.
I know. That's what you've been trying to sell for some time now, but not all of us are buying. As Horse says, there is common knowledge which we, as individuals, acquire as we individually mature. We, like Lila, individually consist of the four static levels of morality plus the ability to respond to DQ. Your "body plus collective" bit is the world according to Arlo. If you are happy believing that, so be it. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
