Ron, Marsha, I was going to respond to Marsha "why does either concept have to be more correct than the other" where did the need to choose either / or come from ?
But I see Ron has alraedy made the point. Ian On 5/15/07, Ron Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [Marsha] > There is snow, and there are snowflakes. Which concept is correct by > the MOQ point-of-view? > > [Ron] > Both, (by MOQ) and by my understanding of it. I think the argument has > gotten lost in terminology. > An "either/ or " logic has deveolped . The crux is where one defines the > boundaries of self. > Ham and horse disagree on "source" Ham defines Essence as source where > Horse holds Pirsigs view > Of Quality. Ham sees Quality as incomplete...As I see it Ham posits an > eternal 0 vs. 1 dichotomy > Which is percieved as finite value sense of subjects and objects. We can > percieve no other way. > Horse holds to value pervading all, "every last bit." and value is > infinite. > > So there is the school of value is infinite and perception of it is > finite and > the school of the eternal struggle of existence and nothingness > percieved as finite value. > The distinction is the belief in absolutes. MOQ does not hold absolutes > > Other opinions are welcome > > > > > > > > > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
