> [dmb]
> A positivist might see volition as some kind of
> miracle, but I don't. It
> seems quite natural and completely ubiquitous. It
> makes a heck of a lot
> more sense because evolutionary theory has to
> account for improvement,
> not just change and variety. There is an apparent
> direction that can't
> be explained in terms of mechanisms, functional fit
> or random mutations.
> [ron]
> Account for improvement.....improvement, back here
> again, good...quality
> . Quality. Value.
> Value
> To be,.... or not, to be. That is the question
> -shakespear
> dare I disturb the universe?-Elliot
> Should I stay or should I go? -the clash
> If you can describe it with words which all would
> understand, surely then
> The truth is surely lost.
Does improvement mean as follows:
More options? As in biological does not include
social or intellectual, but social does include
biological, but not intellectual, and yet again,
intellectual does include social and biological?
here in these woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
