[Craig] It could be both that things that change can be static patterns and also that all change is the result of responses to DQ.
[Arlo] Thanks for this. As I said, I think "static patterns" or "probability waves" (in the SODV sense) are the experienced probability patterns of many, many aggregated responses to DQ, beginning with the "highest" (in the MOQ hierarchy) and most complex repertoire of possibility as spiraling down in ever-decreasing circles of possibility into the lowest and simplest responses of inorganic patterns to DQ. [Platt had said] Cloud formations change because the next formation is better than the last? Hardly. [Krimel then replied] Hardly? No, exactly! Well I am not fond of the "better" part but I wanted to applaud the progress in your thinking. [Arlo] Agree. What we perceive of as a "cloud formation" is a probability wave (again, in the SODV sense) emanating from the aggregate responses (to DQ) of the many smaller inorganic patterns of which it is constructed (themselves "probability waves" emanating from the aggregate responses (to DQ) of the smaller patterns of which they are constructed). So it is perfectly appropriate to say that cloud formations change because it is (pardoning the use of the term) "better" for them to do so. Indeed, it is just such a statement the MOQ encourages us to make. Consider the cloud as a "static, inorganic probability wave". The changes we "experience" are the result of fluxuations in the aggregate responses to DQ from which this probability wave actualizes. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
