> > [Platt]
> > > Do you believe from your understanding of the
> MOQ
> > > that all change is the result of responses to
> DQ?
[SA previously]
> > Well, if a static pattern changed, thus, is
> NOT the same static pattern, then it follows that
> > 'something' creative happened.
[Platt]
> Disagree. The way clouds change depends on a static
> pattern of air
> currents and condensation. Likewise, the wind
> blowing leaves around
> is a static pattern. That a humming bird came into
> your view doesn't violate any
> static pattern of how a humming bird manages to fly.
> Physical laws, after all,
> are static patterns as are the biological laws of
> the jungle. You don't really
> find DQ at work until you get into the human levels,
> like in response to art --
> the beauty of the humming bird, the freshness of a
> song.
I think this helped me the most to see where
your coming from/your perspective. Thanks... I still
find these static patterns coming together in a way
that stimulates an art in how these static patterns
work together. Tree decays, food for grubs, grubs for
woodpeckers, trees now soil, bear poops and another
tree grows. Yes, this is a static pattern, but
static, I don't think, can't bridge beyond its'
borders (levels). The whole system is dynamic - it is
primary reality. How it all works and comes together,
I can watch, enjoy, and it happens, and I'm grateful I
can watch, enjoy and that this does happen. Gotta go.
Trying to define is impossible. Dq is easy. Sq is
difficult.
[Platt]
> Have a nice day.
You too.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get your own web address.
Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
