dmb says: I read the rest of his remarks at that blog with the lovely name and I don't
see any need for disavowals. He goes on to complain that neo-Darwinism has holes in it big enough to drive a Hummer through and further complains that this leaves room for the creationists types to claim that Jesus is driving the Hummers. And, although he doesn't use the term, the problem is apparently that flatland materialism again. In any case, complaining about the holes in neo-Darwinism in particular is not a rejection of the theory of evolution in general. He thinks he has a better idea of evolution, one with holes only big enough to drive a moped through. And Jesus would never drive a moped, thank God. [Krimel] He complains about "neo-Darwins" by advocating an Intelligent Design theorist? Please tell me you are not serious about this guy. "He thinks he has a better idea of evolution" Do tell; where then is his account for how wings develop? I love the whole Hummer, moped, Jesus thing. Its the kind of thing that really makes me wish you would use those powers for something good. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
