Quoting David M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Krim > > You are right they both contest our conceptual framework. > They are both right that we should. Pirsig is better because > he gives us an alternative that is neither authoritarian or > new age 'wet'. Secularism is constructed due to the fear of what > being able to contest concepts and metaphysics entails and makes > possible. Secularism is a form of defence. The problem is like > most security meassures it limits our freedom. I say: so be it, let's > recognise that secularism is a set of values that are contestable. > Let's be free, & not pretend we are not free to contest concepts, > values and metaphysics and recognise that politics is politics.
Good points. In other words, keep an open mind. We still have much to learn about how the world works. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
