>
>

[Marsha]

Freud?  Sigmund?  What you write sounds correct, but too, too,,,, too
neat, too textbook, too static.  Okay, let's take it out of the author's
personal perspective.  That seems to be a path nowhere since 
he is so well hidden.   But there is something there, something so 
obvious it can't be seen.  Or maybe it very, very scary...

Or the talk can continue about TiTs.

[Ron]
to take the gender side out of it and look at what is trying to be
illustrated
I believe it was also illustrated with the story about dusenberry and
the feast with
the natives, where they opened a can of corn and he insisted no,no,no
that's not how it's
supposed to be. the natives laffed and said , "just like a white man,
has to have everything 
just so". Dusenberry's preconception of what a traditional native
gathering did not match what they were presenting and he did'nt like it.
too neat? perhaps, maybe pirsig did'nt mean to emphisize this and I'm
just seeing it. But,
apon a re-reading I think this was his angle, he recreates the situation
afew times with
other characters. There is something to the accompaning storyline which
runs paralell
with his thoughts on James and Pragmatism and MOQ itself. I like believe
Pirisig had more
intent to his vehicle with a message in mind. but maybe I'm seeing
things that were not
intended.




   


moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to