At 10:52 AM 6/5/2007, you wrote: > > > > > >[Marsha] > >Freud? Sigmund? What you write sounds correct, but too, too,,,, too >neat, too textbook, too static. Okay, let's take it out of the author's >personal perspective. That seems to be a path nowhere since >he is so well hidden. But there is something there, something so >obvious it can't be seen. Or maybe it very, very scary... > >Or the talk can continue about TiTs. > >[Ron] >to take the gender side out of it and look at what is trying to be >illustrated >I believe it was also illustrated with the story about dusenberry and >the feast with >the natives, where they opened a can of corn and he insisted no,no,no >that's not how it's >supposed to be. the natives laffed and said , "just like a white man, >has to have everything >just so". Dusenberry's preconception of what a traditional native >gathering did not match what they were presenting and he did'nt like it. >too neat? perhaps, maybe pirsig did'nt mean to emphisize this and I'm >just seeing it. But, >apon a re-reading I think this was his angle, he recreates the situation >afew times with >other characters. There is something to the accompaning storyline which >runs paralell >with his thoughts on James and Pragmatism and MOQ itself. I like believe >Pirisig had more >intent to his vehicle with a message in mind. but maybe I'm seeing >things that were not >intended. >
Ron, You may be correct. It's a mistake to insist that the present adhere to preconceived notions. Thanks for responding. Marsha moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
