> > > [Marsha previously to gav]
> > > > Would you like to write about something that
> > isn't a concept?
> > > > God. Pebble. No difference.
> [SA previously]
> > > What are you asking here?
Alright, I'm going to try to interpret what you
might have been saying here Marsha. I kept asking you
questions so as not to put words in your mouth, to
give you your freedom. Unless you like to labyrinth
on purpose, but this answer you gave to gav above is
seemingly specific. So, I'll say something and maybe
it's what you meant or maybe it doesn't matter to you
what you meant to others or not.
Your saying God and Pebble are concepts. There
is no difference.
If so, then I disagree due to this is correct but
something is still missing in my perspective. God is
not only a concept, but God is to not just be on the
intellectual level. Many different Gods exist if we
go by social level religions. God has been reasoned
differently, therefore on the intellectual level God
has many manifestations, too. According to dynamic
quality, God is rid of, is a changing force, a
creative force, is direct experience, primary reality,
and can't be explained using S/O intellectual musings.
I'd say Pebble is the same, and pebbles have been and
are sacred in certain cultures. Pebbles are reasoned
specifically, more so than God has been due to
science. According to dynamic quality, pebble still
has space to change (back into the mantle, volcano -
lava). Our use for pebbles socially or even
intellectually in an artistic and mystical depth
supplies pebble with all kinds of fun. With Zen
no-mind, I can stare at a pebble and just bask in the
depth and wonderment of what this pebble is without
intellectual explanations.
So, no difference: dynamic quality.
Difference: static quality when the levels made
distinct.
pebble and God when distinct are in a general way
both static patterns of value and here also: no
difference.
So, you see, this statement by you opens all
kinds of curiosity, which I'm inclined to say is good.
Your statement above is a mythology, an analogue, a
static pattern sprouting dynamic quality.
As to the standards set, your seemingly small
statement here has set a standard that is definitely a
depth of no end and no beginning that is dynamic.
Sooooo, who's really setting the standards here? You
see when I ask you questions, I'm seriously wondering
if your intention is to create a mythology, in the
dynamic sense, thus, to encourage a flow of artistic,
free thinking, non-dead static quality.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car
Finder tool.
http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
