SA, God? Nada, I don't want to have this discussion. I will repeat Tom Robbin's words: "I believe in nothing, everything is sacred. I believe in everything, nothing is sacred." These words are a sea of tranquility, and tonight still with only a slight hint of reflection.
Marsha At 12:11 PM 6/17/2007, you wrote: > > > > [Marsha previously to gav] > > > > > Would you like to write about something that > > > isn't a concept? > > > > > God. Pebble. No difference. > > > > [SA previously] > > > > What are you asking here? > > Alright, I'm going to try to interpret what you >might have been saying here Marsha. I kept asking you >questions so as not to put words in your mouth, to >give you your freedom. Unless you like to labyrinth >on purpose, but this answer you gave to gav above is >seemingly specific. So, I'll say something and maybe >it's what you meant or maybe it doesn't matter to you >what you meant to others or not. > Your saying God and Pebble are concepts. There >is no difference. > If so, then I disagree due to this is correct but >something is still missing in my perspective. God is >not only a concept, but God is to not just be on the >intellectual level. Many different Gods exist if we >go by social level religions. God has been reasoned >differently, therefore on the intellectual level God >has many manifestations, too. According to dynamic >quality, God is rid of, is a changing force, a >creative force, is direct experience, primary reality, >and can't be explained using S/O intellectual musings. > I'd say Pebble is the same, and pebbles have been and >are sacred in certain cultures. Pebbles are reasoned >specifically, more so than God has been due to >science. According to dynamic quality, pebble still >has space to change (back into the mantle, volcano - >lava). Our use for pebbles socially or even >intellectually in an artistic and mystical depth >supplies pebble with all kinds of fun. With Zen >no-mind, I can stare at a pebble and just bask in the >depth and wonderment of what this pebble is without >intellectual explanations. > So, no difference: dynamic quality. > Difference: static quality when the levels made >distinct. > pebble and God when distinct are in a general way >both static patterns of value and here also: no >difference. > > So, you see, this statement by you opens all >kinds of curiosity, which I'm inclined to say is good. > Your statement above is a mythology, an analogue, a >static pattern sprouting dynamic quality. > > As to the standards set, your seemingly small >statement here has set a standard that is definitely a >depth of no end and no beginning that is dynamic. >Sooooo, who's really setting the standards here? You >see when I ask you questions, I'm seriously wondering >if your intention is to create a mythology, in the >dynamic sense, thus, to encourage a flow of artistic, >free thinking, non-dead static quality. > >woods, >SA > > > >____________________________________________________________________________________ >Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos >new Car Finder tool. >http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/ >moq_discuss mailing list >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
