At 02:24 AM 6/24/2007, you wrote: >Hi Marsha, > > > > > There is something strange in trying to know about knowing. The > > question is, does epistemology change within the MOQ? > >Change? What was epistemology originally? Epistemology IMHO, is a >problem of SOM, solved by the MOQ. SOM philosophers constantly >question where knowledge comes from since it doesn't have any >objective foundations, thus according to SOM it doesn't exist. So >this problem has been talked about until the cows come home because >the metaphysics from which they were talking couldn't handle the >problem. It became such a problem it was even given a name, >epistemology.
Ahhh, ha ha ha. Wonderful answer! >The MOQ rejects this and says that placing value as the source of all >knowledge removes the SOM conundrum called epistemology. Value is the >source of all knowledge. Knowledge coming from value according to the >MOQ is beautifully called Intellectual patterns of value. Of course, I should be quiet and paint. But these little bits of curiosity are strong, and I keep returning to them. Is the Intellectual Level the highest, or the lowest? Sometimes I wonder. > > Does the > > definition of 'knowing' change? I just thought your limiting > > knowledge to the Intellectual level was interesting. > >No, the definition of knowing doesn't change as said previously, >however you still seem to be having difficulty in understanding? >What's the problem which you are having? Being able to hold the MOQ perspective above the thoughts below. Does that make sense? I suppose my approach to life is intellectually messy. And cheers to you David, Marsha moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
