David, Marsha, good thread I think that "resonance" is also related to David's earlier distinction between the patterns that represent our known knowledge (our mental patterns, however recorded) and the actual "source" of knowledge - what can actually be "known".
My take on that source, the thing that distinguishes it from an ontological view of things with properties, is that the source is the eptistemic view of knowledge or meaning as the "significance of relations between things" - The SOMist problem that MOQ solves as David also put it earlier. Value, quality, is about the significance of relations not "objective poesssions". Ian On 6/25/07, David Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Being able to hold the MOQ perspective above the thoughts > > below. Does that make sense? I suppose my approach to life is > > intellectually messy. > > Hi Marsha, > > That resonates completely. Hard to live a life of quality when the > culture tells us to live a life of possessions. Or the $ as SA puts it. > > Also, nothing wrong with an 'intellectually messy' life, far better > than an 'intellectually clean' life where everything has its place > and has no room for improvement. > > Cheers, > > David. > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
