> [SA previously]]
> Ron and you mentioned sacredness before. I remember Ron akined
> sacredness to betterness. I'm looking for a trigger, a stimulas to
> understand what sacredness is in accord with betterness, thus, a
> dynamic understanding to moral force.
> [Ron]
> I termed it in the phrase "everything is sacred, nothing is sacred"
> all sacred/betterness no one thing more sacred or better.
> betterness/sacredness is best described as a static
pattern which
> grows toward dynamic change.
[SA]
So, generative is betterness, sacredness, moral?
Degenerative is worse, exploitive, immoral?
[Ron]
That's why I feel the term moral or "betterness" does not hit all the
bases when I concieve
of dynamic quality. even when I try to explain in neutral terms, its
opposite arises
in your response. that is why I use "everything is moral,nothing is
moral"
insert your favorite term, moral, sacred, better. growth and decay
pursue dynamic quality.
therefore I tend to believe all is moral.
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
