Quoting ian glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Platt, > You bet I've made that connection. > > Blogged about it several (5 or 6 ?) years ago after meeting two > Cambridge University professors in a bar (The Pickerell, no ordinary > bar - adjacent to their college, Magdelene) discussing ZMM & Lila, > whilst I was sitting within earshot, reading Lila. Turned out one of > the two had previously also been a lecturer at Berkeley and had > "taught" ZMM (though I never did work out what context.) > > The real synchronicity, was not the conversational coincidence, but > the fact that one of them suggested I should follow-up synchronicity > (and Alexander) as related subjects. Apart from the idea that > synchronicity "suggests" underlying invsible "causal" connections, the > line leads to Jungian psychological typing, Malsow and evolutionary > psychology - the latter of course being the source of those > connections (provide we can overcome the knee-jerk prejudice against > the whole evo-psych subject as a dirty word.) > > (My blog is full of mentions synchonicities, people often poke fun at > them, and there are references to synchronicity in my 2005 conference > paper, and on my Pirsig-Pages.) > Ian
Glad to see we both see synchronicities as related to DQ. At the risk of evoking an insult, can you explain their relationship to evolutionary psych? Thanks. Platt ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
