[David H.]
> As you know I'd restrict 'knowledge' to the
intellectual level.
> However 'mental' seems to have biological and
negative social
> connotations. I would hazard a guess RMP avoids the
term in Lila for > this reason.
I never did put knowledge with social. I agreed
that Marsha's example said knowledge was social,
because Marsha said knowledge is social in her
example. I don't agree with this example. It was not
very clear what I was saying, so I let it go.
Mental is biological due to organic brain, I guess
is what you mean. And yes, this would confuse things.
I'm also for putting the four levels together. When
I talk about all four levels I say: static quality or
static patterns of value or static patterns. We could
also refer to say two or only three levels at a time,
but definitions would have to be exact. The MoQ does
ask for precision. So, agreement that mental could be
organic, social and intellect would have to be a solid
agreement, but then that's only one level away from
saying Mental is Static Quality and I'm not for that
at all at this time. I guess mental for social, mob
would be an example of such? But here, mental is
being thrown around as a very general, imprecise word
according to the MOQ, I'd say.
morning music,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
