Hi Marsha, [Marsha] > It seems there is no where further to take this discussion. You see, I > have Liberal tendencies. But it's been interesting discussing things we > don't know. Yes. As you know :-), the study of knowledge is a branch of philosophy called epistemology. We could spend a lifetime on the subject. We haven't gone that far on this site, of course, but some time back we did have a discussion on sources we could all rely on for accurate information. Most agreed that Wikipedia would be OK as a general, unbiased reference. Two newspapers in Britain were recommended -- the "Independent" and "The Guardian." (That's why I used those as a sources for news about National Health Insurance.) Other than that, we couldn't agree on unbiased sources of knowledge, to the best of my recollection anyway.
As for your having "liberal tendencies," you're in good company on this site. One thing among many I like about art is it makes no difference whether the artist is a liberal or conservative. The art speaks for itself. Platt P.S. Cartoon in the New Yorker shows a little boy looking at a painting in a museum with his mother. His mother is talking to the boy saying, "Instead of 'It sucks' you could say "It doesn't speak to me." Unfortunately, most of my paintings "suck." But, that doesn't stop me. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
