I also like Sharon Taberski's recommendation to have two periods of student self-selected reads a day: one with "just right" books and one with open choice.
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:50:53 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > [email protected]> Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] just right books?> > It > seems to work well to set a ratio (say 5 "just right" books, for > every one > "challenge")- this keeps the door open to high interest > books, but also > keeps comprehension and fluency on track. Knowing > that a high interest book > is just a title or two away is great > motivator, nudging kids to try genres > and authors they don't have > much experience with- and if they are truly > great texts- kids often > discover they like books on their level. The key is > finding really > compelling texts w/ age appropriate theme, message, language > in a > wide range of levels.> > > On Apr 24, 2008, at 9:31 PM, <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > I don't know if I disagree, but I do have instances > where I think > > allowing "interest" to direct the student to a higher level > book > > can be a mistake. The instance I am thinking of, and it occurs > > > quite frequently in my classrooms, is a student who simply wants to > > > "look" like they are reading a higher level book. I have a number > > of > students over the years who believe word calling is the same as > > reading > and who demand higher books. I know the main reason they > > are driven this > way is to "look" better around their peers, who may > > be reading quite > difficult texts. But the end result is they don't > > read at all--just flip > pages and go through the actions. I am at a > > school that might over stress > fluency in the primary grades and I > > do believe that might be part of the > problem. Anyone else have this > > experience?> >> > On the other hand, I > have also had students struggle through a > > tough book because they are > driven "fervent" about wanting to read > > it. I would never resist such a > request.> >> > :)Bonita> >> > ---- HERBERT Suzanne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:> >> Okay Mary, where was the conference and who was doing the talking > and> >> was their any 'current research' as everything we are being told > >> > to do> >> is based on 'current research'. Interest supercedes level....is > > >> there> >> anyone out there who has a different opinion on all of this.? > Thanks> >> Mary.> >> >> > _______________________________________________> > > Mosaic mailing list> > [email protected]> > To unsubscribe or > modify your membership please go to> > > http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/ > > > mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.> >> > Search the MOSAIC archives at > http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.> >> > > > _______________________________________________> Mosaic mailing list> > [email protected]> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please > go to> > http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.> > > Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. > _________________________________________________________________ Back to work after baby–how do you know when you’re ready? http://lifestyle.msn.com/familyandparenting/articleNW.aspx?cp-documentid=5797498&ocid=T067MSN40A0701A _______________________________________________ Mosaic mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
