True, DISTAR does have a connection to Open Court-- that connection is that
Bereiter who was part of DISTAR is an author of Open Court.  However,
Sigfried Engelman, who IS Reading Mastery personified, originally developed
DISTAR, and I BELIEVE (???) had Carl Bereiter as a co-author.  Suffice it to
say, if it is a program published by SRA, those are the boys.

And Lori's data from the 70s appears to back up what the What Works
Clearinghouse said about the DI programs and supports the recent news
articles which refer to WWC and say that after a massive amount of money
spent on Reading First programs (as well as up to double instructional
time), there is no significant, measurable difference on comprehension
scores at, I think, the third grade level.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:32 AM, Ljackson <[email protected]> wrote:

> In our district, it was implemented with a vengence in the 70's.  We have
> data showing the impact it had on student performance. It elevated initial
> reading scores, as it clearly impacted decoding.  However, by the time
> students reached third grade, remembering at that time a distinct shift in
> the testing at the third grade level from learning to read to reading  to
> learn, reading scored plummeted. Not only did they drop, they were lower
> than ever before.  Distar does have a connection to a recent reinvention,
> but the link is to Open Court.
>
>
>
> Lori Jackson
>  District Literacy Coach and Mentor
>  Todd County School District
>  Box 87
>  Mission SD 5755
>
> ----- Original message -----
> From: Laura <[email protected]>
> To: Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group <
> [email protected]>
> Date: Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] Reading Mastery, etcetera
>
> > I'm not familiar with Reading Mastery but I remember Distar.  It was just
> > coming into vogue when I left teaching to stay with babies.  4 children
> and
> > 9 years later when I returned I didn't hear anymore about it.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Renee" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group"
> > <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 9:05 AM
> > Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] Reading Mastery, etcetera
> >
> >
> > I agree with Laura.
> > Anyone remember Distar? Is Reading Mastery just Distar, revisited?
> >
> > The idea of hiding the pictures makes me cringe. :(
> >
> > Renee
> >
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2009, at 11:55 AM, Laura Klug wrote:
> >
> > > To my way of thinking , this approach makes no sense at all,
>  especially
> > > for struggling readers. Why make those who are having  trouble breaking
> > > the code learn another code ? Of course they are  confused. They are
> > > cfonfused about what real reading is.  To be sure ,  struggling readers
> > > need a systematic way to understand the way words  work, but that is
> one
> > > small part of what makes one a reader. Real text  makes a reader
> because
> > > there is a reciprocal process that is always  there between the reader
> and
> > > the text.
> > > I would not recommend such an approach to anyone wanting to help
>  improve
> > > the quality of instuction for students.
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > From: [email protected] on behalf of Amy McGovern
> > > Sent: Wed 1/28/2009 1:26 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] Reading Mastery, etcetera
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>  > > As someone who taught Reading Mastery and now trains and consults on
> > > these programs I can share that in all my schools, we have never boxed
>  up
> > > trade books or classroom libraries.   Children need the experience  of
> > > reading trade books.  Indeed, I think we all agree that students
>  should
> > > read and be read to from a variety of books.  The goals of  teachers
> who
> > > thoughtfully use Direct Instruction programs are the same  as the goals
> of
> > > teachers who use Guided Reading or any other  methodology or pedagogy.
>  We
> > > all want to teach children to read well  and to love reading.  To do
> this
> > > effectively, students should have  access to a rich variety of books.
> > > Here are some insights on what  Beverlee is referring to below.  Again,
> > > please know that I do not  personally or professionally advocate the
> > > boxing up of any trade  books.  If administrators are concerned about
> > > confusing the students  because trade books are in the room where
> Reading
> > > Mastery is being  taught, the answer is to provide more top quality
> staff
> > > development  and classroom coaching- not to remove the books.  There
> are
> > > differences to how early reading is taught in DI vs. a Guided Reading
> > > approach (for example).  Is there potential for confusion if primary
> > > students are getting lessons in both?  Yes.  Can that be overcome?
> Yes.
> > > But it takes training and a willingness to make some changes in  how
> the
> > > GR lesson is taught to the fragile learner or very young  learner.  The
> > > teacher's guide for Reading Mastery (RMI classic) does  not advocate
> > > mixing RM with other forms of instruction.   Having said  that, Trade
> > > books and DI can and should happily co-exist. There are  two big
> > > differences that come to mind when thinking about Trade books  and the
> > > storybooks used in Reading Mastery levels 1 and 2.  To begin  with, K,
> 1st
> > > and 2nd grade students who are in Reading Mastery levels  1 and 2 are
> > > reading material that is written with a modified  orthography.  That
> means
> > > that the print looks different.  The students  are taught to sound out
> > > words as their first way of approaching an  unfamiliar word.  To make
> this
> > > easier for the students, the 40 sound  symbols in the English Language
> are
> > > written in such a way that they  look visually different.  Each
> > > sound/symbol is explicitly taught and  practiced.  Spelling always
> remains
> > > correct.  Letters that are not  pronounced when a word is sounded out
> are
> > > written smaller. Beginning  in RM2, the print begins to transition back
> to
> > > "normal".   By the end  of RM2, students are reading stories written
> with
> > > regular print.    Another significant difference between trade book and
> > > the storybooks  in RM1: the pictures in the storybook are intentionally
> > > put on the 2nd  page.  They are hidden from view while the children are
> > > reading the  story for the first few times.  The purpose of this is to
> > > help the  students focus on the text.  The story is read 2 to 3 times
> > > before the  picture is given attention.  The goal is to get the
> students
> > > to be  accurate, appropriately fluent, then ask comprehension
> questions--
> > > and  finally to enjoy the picture.  It may also be relevant to point
> out
> > > that the text of these stories is intentionally controlled so that
> > > students experience high levels of success continuously.  I am only
> > > scratching the surface of the details and procedures in RM. My hope is
> > > that you can see, with the vast knowledge base on this site, a few of
>  the
> > > difference between a balanced lit approach to early reading and  what
> > > happens in an early RM lesson.  The fact that there are  differences
> > > between the two approaches is ok because some kids need  the design of
> RM
> > > to become successful readers.   With all this in  mind, I have found
> that
> > > children in Reading Mastery 1 and 2 benefit  from taking what they are
> > > learning to do very well-- and  practicing/applying these skills while
> > > reading thoughtfully chosen  trade books or leveled readers.  When done
> > > well, this type of practice  only reinforces the transfer of skills
> from
> > > Reading Mastery to all  types of reading material.  This is the goal.
>  My
> > > own experience is  that primary kids in RM confidently pull high
> interest
> > > books off the  shelves and give them a try.  Reading Mastery has
> empowered
> > > them.   They see themselves as readers because they are.   I hope this
> > > information helps.   Amy McGovernEducational ConsultantDirect
>  Instruction
> > > Trainer and Coach since 2001.> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009  06:46:55 -0700>
> > > From: [email protected]> To:  [email protected]>
> Subject:
> > > [MOSAIC] Reading Mastery,  etcetera> > Hi all - I'd like to ask a
> question
> > > that affects everyone  interested in> teaching comprehension,
> especially
> > > in a release to  independence format. Do> any of you know of any
> instances
> > > where  schools have adopted Reading Mastery> or another Direct
> Instruction
> > > program and have been forced to eliminate the> use of trade books in
> > > classrooms (or, alternately, very limited> participation in a library
> > > program) in order to use comprehension strategies> (or other
>  strategies,
> > > actually) in the classroom? I think I remember> someone on  this list
> > > serve saying that the principal and curriculum director>  came by and
> > > loaded up all the trade books so they didn't "confuse" the  K,> 1, and
> > > maybe 2 grade students. Help, please. Bev>
> > > _______________________________________________> Mosaic mailing list>
> > > [email protected]> To unsubscribe or modify your membership
> > > please go to>  http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/
> > > mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.> > Search the MOSAIC archives at
> > > http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.>
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Windows Live(tm) Hotmail(R)...more than just e-mail.
> > > http://windowslive.com/howitworks?
> > > ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_hm_justgotbetter_howitworks_012009
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mosaic mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> > > http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/
> mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> > >
> > > Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mosaic mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> > > http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/
> mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> > >
> > > Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
> > >
> > >
> > "The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of
> > crisis, remain neutral." ~ Edmund Burke
>  >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mosaic mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> > http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> >
> > Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mosaic mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> > http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> >
> > Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
>
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.

Reply via email to