Emily,
I teach third grade and currently have 4 children (two of them are ELL) who are 
extremely fluent readers but I have been frustrated by their lack of 
comprehension (which has placed them below grade level) and my ability to help 
them to grow as readers.  We have done a lot of explicit strategy work, but it 
has not seemed to do the trick.  Recently, I have been working with them using 
short non-fiction text and it seems to be building their confidence.  They have 
finally begun to take risks that they were not taking before.  I give them an 
organizer before reading that I create to go along with the text.  We also use 
coded post-it notes to code questions, important information (main idea), 
interesting facts and they also go along with the organizer.  Today we read an 
article from National Geographic about owls.  Prior to reading the article I 
read Gail Gibbons book on owls.  Having built some prior knowledge for them 
they were able to make sense of the new text more readily.  I also had them 
working in cooperative groups on adaptations and one of the students was able 
to connect back to a book her group was reading on migration.  I am thinking 
that big part of the problem for my children is their need for more prior 
knowledge so that they feel successful when they are working with text.  Going 
forward I need to select books very carefully, so that I am able to 
specifically build schema for them prior to reading. Unfortunately, it is not 
always easy to choose wisely when you have many groups simultaneously reading 
different text.  I also think it is easier to do with non-fiction than fiction.

Leslie 

Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and 
those who matter don't mind."
  ~ Dr. Seuss


_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.

Reply via email to