The WIDA test only measures an ELL's language proficiency in the areas of speaking, listening, reading, and writing. It does not replace the DRA. For reading the DRA is a better tool to use. Have a good school year!
On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Licette Morales wrote:

How do you like using the WIDA? Do you think it is more accurate than the
DRA? IS it easier to use?

Thanks

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Hoffmann Dale Marie <[email protected] >wrote:

Yes, our district also uses the WIDA assessments.

On Sep 14, 2010, at 1:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:


I know that many teachers have abandoned the DRA because it can be time consuming especially in the upper grades. There is a written component for grades 4 and up (grade 3 has an optional one I believe). Even though it may take some students about an hour to complete, I feel that the information I get about the students is crucial to drive my instruction. I don't really like that the engagement piece is worth so many points but I take that into consideration when looking at it. Our district uses the WIDDA for ELL
assessment.
Sue

-----Original Message-----
From: Hoffmann Dale Marie <[email protected]>
To: Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group <
[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Sep 14, 2010 6:41 am
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] data collection for analysis


What ELL assessment do you give your ELL's.
Dale Marie
On Sep 13, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Valerie Vitalo wrote:

Just curious as to why districts have abandoned DRA's. We give the >

DRA-2 3 times per year in grades k-5 We give phonological > awareness tests and sightword inventories to all of our kidin > 1,2,and 3 and in K
later on in the year. We have periodic writing > assessments with
district-wide prompts that match a writing calendar > for units for the
district. Teacher give running records to > students when they are
considering moving to the next guided reading > level. There is an ELL evaluation at the beginning and end of year > also. They continually add asessments. Classroom teachers do some > of it and the lit team for the building does the rest. We get a > really comprehensive picture of these
little guys before we group > and continually regroup as necessary.

--- On Sun, 9/12/10, Jan Sanders <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Jan Sanders <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] data collection for analysis
To: "Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group"

<[email protected]> >

Date: Sunday, September 12, 2010, 6:46 PM


In our district the teacher gives a running record to each student

and

submits the data to the principal.
Plusses and minuses for teacher or team to assess. Teacher knows the
student as a reader instantly after the assessment, but not all >

teachers

administer it the same, although there was a major training 6 years >

ago.

Each year they are given the criteria, a reminder of how to assess, >

and can

watch a video of a lit coach giving the assessment.

Jan
You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to >

your

grandmother.
-Albert Einstein



On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Betsy Lafontant
<[email protected]>wrote:

My school using a fairly low-tech but effective means of assessing the
students' reading progress. At the start of the year, the Student >>

Support

Services team (which consisted of ESOL, Learning Support, and the >>

school

counselor) tested the reading abilities of each child in our >>

elementary

school using a running record. The tester started where the >>

student tested

out at then of last year or for new students, where the classroom >>

teacher

believes is the student's reading level. It took two intense weeks for
the
SSS team and lots of pullouts for the classroom teacher. But at the end
we
had a comprehensive data on each child's reading levels. This >>

process is

repeated at the end of the year to track progress and to reflect on our
teaching practice and methods.

This is the third year my school is doing this. The first year it >>

was a

bit
of a mess because some testers had different "lens" on when they

were

testing. Some put more emphasis on fluency while others only >>

tested for

comprehension. In the second year, the testing team met every day to
discuss the process, streamline and normalize their practice. In >>

the third

year, this process is sleek, fast and the end product, the data, is
extremely valuable to the classroom teacher.

For writing, we have a writing test. With a common prompt, each >>

child

writes a story. No names are on the writing test. Then the >>

writing tests

are divided among the classroom teachers and are scored using a >>

rubric

based
on the 6 traits (ideas, sentence fluency, mechanics, voice, >>

organization

and
word choice). This data is collected and used to drive the classroom
instruction for each child. Like the reading, this process is >>

repeated

towards the end of the year.

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Jeana Wise >>

<[email protected]

wrote:


What types of data does your schools collect for anaylsis? My >>>

district is

using Aimsweb, but I am thinking that other forms of data may be helpful
when looking at interventions for our struggling students. My >>>

district no

longer gives the DRA, either.

Jeana Wise
K-4 Literacy Coach
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to

http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org >>>
.


Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.


_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to

http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org >>
.


Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.


_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to

http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org >
.


Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.





_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to

http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org >
.


Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.


_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org .

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org .

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



_______________________________________________

Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org .

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.


_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org .

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.

Reply via email to