Ron!!!
Thank you for your thoughtful post to the listserv.  Your words have helped me 
develop an "agentive narrative" about my work on the listserv and I truly 
appreciate it! ;-)
 
The chapter on praise, for me, was the place when I started beating up on 
myself as a teacher. I was always liberal with my praise...trying to make it 
specific...but often it was personal. "You reread that ! That's what good 
readers do!! Good job!!"  Now I understand personal praise has a dark 
underbelly. Other students hearing that might think, "so I don't reread and 
that makes me a bad reader."  I also understand that when we focus feedback on 
HOW rather than what...that we are helping students become strategic. 

Now as to your last wonderful question (love it!!)  I have found it challenging 
to try to develop prompts that: 1) apply to a world-wide audience (This 
listserv does have a world-wide membership) 2) help people think and dig into 
the text and 3) are open-ended enough so that multiple perspectives are both 
possible and useful.   As I look back, I might think about asking folks to 
share more about their own classroom experiences in relation to the text. An 
example... can you think of  a student in your class that has a fixed 
performance frame or a dynamic learning frame? How do you know that a child has 
one or the other and what have you done in the past? What will you do now that 
you know what you know?? So, Ron, or anyone else...feel free to take THAT 
prompt and run with it if you wish! :-)
Jennifer

-----Original Message-----
From: Mosaic 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Ron Heady
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 7:01 AM
To: Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] Chapter four of Opening Minds

I am finding all the ideas in the book--as you just described this one, 
Jennifer--"powerful."  I have to admit that in the opening pages I was dismayed 
by some of what I considered jargon and "made up" words ("agentive," 
"dialogic," etc.).  However, I have moved past that response because so much of 
the book resonates very (again) powerfully.  Some have reacted strongly to 
Johnston's "criticism" of praise, emphasizing he process rather than the 
product or the producer when examining "work" has helped me understand the 
rationale behind some of our "best practices" that have not always worked very 
effectively for me.  I think the kind of training and preparation he describes 
in the chapter will give things like "reciprocal teaching" and paired reading 
activities greater depth and meaning.  The long-term value he posits I found 
very moving and inspiring.

(PS:  You have phrased your prompts very clearly and effectively; as you 
reflected on them, which ones would you change?) 
________________________________________


_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive

Reply via email to