Maybe a more transparent error message would help? On Tuesday 11 May 2010 17:20:26 Hieu Hoang wrote: > i thought about making it back-compatible but the code gets messy and > error prone. Theres now 3 more phrase table - the text SCFG, binary > SCFG, and the suffix array. > > So i thought it better to take the punch now and feel a short, sharp > pain rather than let it linger. > > however, anyone wants to put back the old code to make it back comp, > they're welcome to, as long as u look after it > > On 11/05/2010 17:04, Christian Hardmeier wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> The first error that you give is because the format of the moses.ini > >> file has changed. You need to add an extra digit at the beginning of the > >> line that specifies the ttable-file. Add 0 for a memory-based ttable, > >> and 1 for a binarised ttable. > > > > Is there a reason why we can't have backwards compatibility here? I'm a > > bit concerned about moving to the latest decoder version since it will > > require me to update the configuration file of each and every system > > I've ever trained, and then they won't work with the old decoders any > > more. Couldn't the decoder figure out on its own whether it should be 0 > > or 1 if the indication is missing, as it used to do? > > > > Cheers, > > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > > Moses-support mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support > > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
