The symal source code is duplicated between the moses-smt and mgiza
repositories.  Does it make sense to have both?  They're quietly
diverging, which is probably a bad thing.

Here's the differences that I can see:
 * I modernized the code in moses-smt.  Big diff, no functional change.
 * The moses-smt version supports longer source and target strings.
 * The mgiza version has what looks like some extra debug output.
 * The moses-smt version avoids non-portable use of /dev/stdout.
 * One builds through bjam, the other through cmake.

Could we perhaps just delete the mgiza one, and tell people to use the
one from moses instead?


Jeroen
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to