What the exact commands u used to compile moses and mgiza? I'm pretty sure
they don't overwrite each other unless you ask them too. They're
independent projects
On 10 Jan 2016 14:07, "Ergun Bicici" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I compiled another Moses instance and symal appears to be copied from
> mgiza still to mosesdecoder/bin/. ​
>
>
> *Best Regards,*
> Ergun
>
> Ergun Biçici
> DFKI Projektbüro Berlin
>
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Ergun Bicici <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Moses' symal:
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.nlp.moses.user/11544
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Ergun
>>
>> Ergun Biçici, CNGL, School of Computing, DCU, www.cngl.ie
>> http://www.computing.dcu.ie/~ebicici/
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jeroen Vermeulen <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The symal source code is duplicated between the moses-smt and mgiza
>>> repositories.  Does it make sense to have both?  They're quietly
>>> diverging, which is probably a bad thing.
>>>
>>> Here's the differences that I can see:
>>>  * I modernized the code in moses-smt.  Big diff, no functional change.
>>>  * The moses-smt version supports longer source and target strings.
>>>  * The mgiza version has what looks like some extra debug output.
>>>  * The moses-smt version avoids non-portable use of /dev/stdout.
>>>  * One builds through bjam, the other through cmake.
>>>
>>> Could we perhaps just delete the mgiza one, and tell people to use the
>>> one from moses instead?
>>>
>>>
>>> Jeroen
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moses-support mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moses-support mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>
>
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to