you shouldn't copy anything into the moses/bin directory.
The mgiza files should have its own directory. When you run Moses'
train-model.perl you can refer to that directory using
.../train-model.perl external-bin-dir=[directory with mgiza]
On 10/01/16 17:20, Ergun Bicici wrote:
Hi Hieu,
First a compile:
./bjam --max-kenlm-order=10 --git --prefix=/path/moses/mosesdecoder/
--with-giza=/path/mgiza/mgizapp/inst/
--with-xmlrpc-c=/path/moses/mosesdecoder/opt/
--with-boost=/path/moses/mosesdecoder/opt/
--with-cmph=/path/moses/mosesdecoder/opt/ -j 20
then, a copy:
cp mgiza/mgizapp/inst/bin/* moses/mosesdecoder/instdir/bin/
cp mgiza/mgizapp/inst/lib/* moses/mosesdecoder/instdir/lib/
cp mgiza/mgizapp/inst/scripts/* moses/mosesdecoder/instdir/bin/
With which another copy appears to be needed to use Moses' symal:
cp
moses/mosesdecoder/symal/bin/gcc-4.8/release/link-static/threading-multi/symal
moses/mosesdecoder/bin/symal
Therefore, even if the path to mgiza is provided
(--with-giza=/path/mgiza/mgizapp/inst/), some copying and updated
appear to be needed (see also
http://www.statmt.org/moses/?n=Moses.ExternalTools#ntoc3).
/Best Regards,/
Ergun
Ergun Biçici
DFKI Projektbüro Berlin
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Hieu Hoang <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What the exact commands u used to compile moses and mgiza? I'm
pretty sure they don't overwrite each other unless you ask them
too. They're independent projects
On 10 Jan 2016 14:07, "Ergun Bicici" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
I compiled another Moses instance and symal appears to be
copied from mgiza still to mosesdecoder/bin/.
/Best Regards,/
Ergun
Ergun Biçici
DFKI Projektbüro Berlin
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Ergun Bicici
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Moses' symal:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.nlp.moses.user/11544
Best Regards,
Ergun
Ergun Biçici, CNGL, School of Computing, DCU, www.cngl.ie
<http://www.cngl.ie>
http://www.computing.dcu.ie/~ebicici/
<http://www.computing.dcu.ie/%7Eebicici/>
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jeroen Vermeulen
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The symal source code is duplicated between the
moses-smt and mgiza
repositories. Does it make sense to have both?
They're quietly
diverging, which is probably a bad thing.
Here's the differences that I can see:
* I modernized the code in moses-smt. Big diff, no
functional change.
* The moses-smt version supports longer source and
target strings.
* The mgiza version has what looks like some extra
debug output.
* The moses-smt version avoids non-portable use of
/dev/stdout.
* One builds through bjam, the other through cmake.
Could we perhaps just delete the mgiza one, and tell
people to use the
one from moses instead?
Jeroen
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
--
Hieu Hoang
http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
