Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available

[John Gardiner Myers]

Ben Bucksch wrote:
> It would make a lot more sense to me to show the type of "security"
> (signed yes/no *and* encrypted yes/no) and the strength (algorithm, key
> length) there. I must be missing something...

Encryption means little without signing.  Without signing, you could
easily have a 128-bit encrypted conversation with an impersonator.

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature