Chris Hoess wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Thomas wrote:
>...
> > I'd use <q> for quotes. That's what the element is there for, after
> > all.
> >
> > (Q doesn't work in 4.x, but in most cases you don't miss much. If
> > you're in source code or something where the quotes are important,
> > you probably shouldn't be trying to use curly entities in the first
> > place.)
>...
> Is <q> intended for all places where you'd use quotation marks, or is
> it only for inline *quotations*?
The latter.
> I think the Unicode quotes would be
> more appropriate than <q> for markup inside, say, a <code> element.
>...
| If you're in source code or something where the quotes are important,
| you probably shouldn't be trying to use curly entities in the first
| place.)
--
Matthew `mpt' Thomas, Mozilla UI Design component default assignee thing
<http://mozilla.org/>
