In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, fantasai
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think bright borders and coloring are a bit strong for
> just a "note". I usually style a "note" with italics.
> Maybe rename the class "important"?
I agree that "note" might be too mild. (Are there broken browsers that
confuse ".important" and "!important"?)
> You shouldn't automatically assume <dl> = toc. That
> diagnosis should be done by a human.
OK.
> One thing I noticed when I was adjusting the Roadmap code
> for my sample page was the use of a shaded background color
> on the table. I created a class ("shaded")
...
> How do you think should this be dealt with on mozilla.org?
It is probably best to introduce a class called shaded, since we're
stuck with the current wrapper for now and Nav4.x might break it if we
introduced rules that apply to all tables.
OTOH, I believe that at some point we need to add another @imported
style sheet anyway for styles that Nav 4.x must not see.
> Three things that should be added to the guidelines:
> 1. No page should ever set a text color without setting
> a background color and vice versa. Individual pages
> should, in general, avoid changing any colors.
Pages shouldn't define colors at all. That's a job for the wrapper
(trough persistent-style.css).
> 2. There shouldn't be any 'font-family' settings on
> individual pages.
OK.
> 3. No inline styles unless you're demonstrating CSS.
OK.
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/
