Re: Converting documents to Strict--call for comments

[Henri Sivonen]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Illsley 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Your point about the wrapper is the clincher and so I support what you 
> are saying. I still think that (and indeed you script may do this) it is 
> a good idea to make as much of the page xml compliant as possible purely 
> to make future updates easier but to stick to an HTML 4.01 Strict 
> DOCTYPE for the time being.

The after running moz-org2strict.pl the page is as close to XHTML 1.0 
Strict as it can be without being invalid HTML 4.01 Strict. Switching 
over to XHTML at a later date would be easy.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/