I think most of the other bugs that hang off of 67376 have more to do with help system type stuff, so you needn't dig in too hard there. But by all means if you want to bring 6.2 stuff back into Mozilla that way, I'd be more than happy to broker the updated stuff into Mozilla for you, though I think I did this update (NS6.2->Mozilla) not long before we released, so there shouldn't be *too much* difference between the two sets. Maybe you'll look at the Mozilla docs and tell me otherwise...
In any case, they still need the sanitizing described in that bug. -ian Andy Ruddock wrote: > Ian Oeschger wrote: > > > Hi Andy I checked the NS documentation into Mozilla some time ago > > thinking it would be a useful starting place for Mozilla-specific > > stuff. There have been some efforts to "sanitize" this NS > > documentation for Mozilla, but that process is not complete, and so > > there are places where the NS still shows through pretty badly. > > > > This effort was being tracked in: > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46917 > > > > > and I think there has been some renewed interest in getting the help > docs > > cleaned up. I was also planning on checking in the existing NS > context-sensitive > > help docs in place of the stubs that say something like "write me" > > pretty soon--but again, these may need some updates as well. > > > > -ian > > > Thanks for that, I've added myself into the CC list for that bug, and > also bug-id=67376 which is a dependant. > > There's loads of bug dependancies from thereon in and I don't have the > time right now to go through them all. I was considering going through > the help from NS6.2 and seeing how much of it could be put into the > current Mozilla help. > > I can see there's a few people working on this, although I don't know > how much time they have to devote to it. I'll see what time allows me to > do here over the next few days and if it looks as if I'll be able to get > some serious results I'll get back. >
